December 5, 2014
February 1, 2014
FEB. 2014 UPDATE
Uing http://www.geni.com/surnames/hyden I UPDATED PAGES 1, 2, 2a, 2b, 4, 12a, and 17.
I have to admit that I found many contradiction on the site including the placement of people in the wrong generation. The information that I thought was correct, I entered on these updated pages in BLUE print. Blue on other pages is from the 1012 update.
I should repeat again that I didn't create any of these trees using research that I myself collected so I can not swear as to their accuracy. This is because my reason for researching HYDENs is to find if any of the HYTENs or HITENs that I follow may have been Hydens who at some point changed the spelling of their names from Hyden. In five different instances I found this to be true. If you go the www.hytenhiten.blogspot.com you will see those who were Hydens and those whom I have yet to connect anywhere.
I have to admit that I found many contradiction on the site including the placement of people in the wrong generation. The information that I thought was correct, I entered on these updated pages in BLUE print. Blue on other pages is from the 1012 update.
I should repeat again that I didn't create any of these trees using research that I myself collected so I can not swear as to their accuracy. This is because my reason for researching HYDENs is to find if any of the HYTENs or HITENs that I follow may have been Hydens who at some point changed the spelling of their names from Hyden. In five different instances I found this to be true. If you go the www.hytenhiten.blogspot.com you will see those who were Hydens and those whom I have yet to connect anywhere.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
